III)     In the Variation with the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Edition) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed towards the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

14. Inside the light from the position explained previously mentioned, it is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to generally be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault of his individual and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency inside the duration of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

4.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of someday during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness of your alleged prevalence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place being the real brothers from the deceased but they didn't respond whatsoever for the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on so many events that extra judicial confession of the accused is a weak sort of evidence which may be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is also counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners jointly over a motorcycle at four.

Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for the Supreme Court of the United States is obtainable to the court’s website.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. When the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then solution the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.

The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological facets allows for just a more thorough legal reaction.

Law professors traditionally click here have played a much smaller sized role in creating case regulation in common regulation than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil law traditions are historically brief[four] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much on the exposition in the law in civil regulation traditions is completed by lecturers rather than by judges; this is called doctrine and could be published in treatises or in journals for instance Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common legislation courts relied small on legal scholarship; thus, within the turn with the twentieth century, it had been very exceptional to find out an instructional writer quoted inside of a legal decision (other than Possibly for the tutorial writings of well known judges for instance Coke and Blackstone).

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to your Judgment within time. Read more

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is place in its place.

 Criminal cases While in the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil legislation systems, common legislation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to a person, by doing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently harmful that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death in the these types of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.